if the end image is the same, what is the point? if one image is better, does it matter how?
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Caveman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:04 Subject: Re: OT: Bayer image example > Wouldn't this be the correct way to print/display the digital image > before starting to do comparisons with film ? If you process it with > interpolation and god knows what other algorithms, then how can you jump > out the gun with conclusions like "digital is smoother and has less > grain" etc. If I take two images and get them through that great > FixItLaterInPhotoshop (TM) technology, doing different processing to > them, how can I assess the quality of the original images by looking at > the processed ones ? Isn't this like comparing a camera clara painting > with a photograph ?
