I'd reply to you off list, Willie, but your ISP rejects mail from my company
gateway ISP:
---------------------------------------
In the return mail...
  Recipient address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
  Diagnostic code: smtp;553 You have been administratively blocked. See
http://www.accesscomm.ca/internet/blocked (#5.7.1)
  Remote system: dns;qmail.accesscomm.ca
(TCP|206.13.28.240|64159|204.83.142.82|25) (qmail.accesscomm.ca  Welcome
Dude. ESMTP)
-----------------------------------------
The link (above) says...
553 Administratively blocked. See http://www.accesscomm.ca/internet/blocked

If you tried to send mail to a user in the accesscomm.ca domain and received
this error, it means that your mail server (or its smarthost, if applicable)
has been blocked from talking to our mail server. This can happen one of two
ways:

1.    Your mail server was engaged in activities frequently employed by
spammers, and was automatically blocked.
2.    Multiple other systems on the same network as your mail server were
engaged in activities frequently employed by spammers, resulting in the
entire network being automatically blocked.

If you are attempting to send legitimate email to one of our users, and it
is being blocked, please contact the administrator of your mail server. You
can refer your administrator to this page, and he/she can contact us at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not contact us directly at this address; we
will respond only to the mail server or netblock administrator.

If you are an Access Communications Internet subscriber and have received
this error, please contact our abuse department directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or our Internet Help Desk at 565-5357.

We apologize for any inconvenience this process may have caused you.

Internet Administration Group
Access Communications
-----------------------------------------------
This is my complete header as they received it...
  Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Received: from tcp-daemon.mta6.snfc21.pbi.net by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net
   (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.6 (built Oct 18 2002))
   id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (original mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
   ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:36:00 -0800 (PST)
  Received: from BOBBYBGOOD ([216.100.84.63])
   by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.6 (built
Oct 18
   2002)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:33:45 -0800 (PST)
  Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:32:19 -0800
  From: Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Subject: Re: It's started!
  To: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Reply-to: Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  MIME-version: 1.0
  X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
  X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
  Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
  Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
  X-Priority: 3
  X-MSMail-priority: Normal
  References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

As you can see, the server they are referring to is a pbi.net server (That's
Pacific Bell). Pacific Bell (SBC) is one of the larger ISPs in the US and is
used by many regular businesses like ours (Technocom Corporation
www.technocom-wireless.com) pacbell.net is our gateway.

So, Willie, looks like you'll never be receiving anything from me or anyone
else using pacbell.net directly.

Regards,
Bob...
---------------------------------------------------
"Beer is proof that God loves us
and wants us to be happy"
   - Benjamin Franklin


Reply via email to