gfen wrote: > I'm a little bothered that you completley took that out of context, and > the fact that its a direct response to Pal stating its not a good looking > camera and derivitive trash.
Good looking is in the eye of the beholder. But it does not look original and distinctive and I believe that it need to do to get other than those with k-mount inventories to be interested. What bothers me isn't the fact that the *ist D look like it does, cause I'll never buy one anyway, but the fact that it may indicate Pentax future lack of direction. Hopefully, it doesn't. It is likely that Pentax plays it safe in entry level and the body above them will show more originality, thats why I'm after all is using Pentax. P�l
