Bruce wrote: > An LX with AF would be yawned at by most of the world - it would only > appeal to a few die hard Pentaxians.
True enough > A robocamera is swallowed up by > Canon/Nikon offering the same basic thing. But thats what the *ist D is. It is just a shrinked Canon D10 or D100. Thats whats worries me... >Small, light, clean and > simple is where the others don't do so well. The 'ist D is small and light but neither clean or simple. P�l
