Don't tell me, tell the digital is best guys. Mind you I had a model who printed out 4 MP shots she took on her digi cam to 8x10 and showed an agency, They laughed and told her to get shots on film.
--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read alot of "garbage" about how you > only need so many Mpixels scans to make a really > good > 8X10" digital print. Well I've been printing > alot of 8X10" BW prints lately (digital, Epson 1280 > printer set to 2880 dpi) and I'm finding > you need LOTS of Mpixels to get optimum > results. > > I've printed: > 1.3 Mpixel digicam output > ~8Mpixel 35mm 2400 ppi scans > ~30Mpixel 120 2400 ppi 67scans > `90Mpixel 4X5" 2400 ppi scans > > Result? Even at 8X10 print size you can clearly > see a difference with each progressively larger > scan file size. The prints made from 4X5 scans > are incredible! WOW! > > Dont be fooled into thinking that you only > need 3, 6, 10 or even 20 Mpixels to maximize > an 8X10 print. The difference between a 30 and a 90 > Mpixel scan is still clearly visable to the naked > eye! > > I'd love to post my latest 4X5" scan, but even as a > jpeg > it's 37 Mbyte! I have enuff space on my server but > it > would take about a day to upload it. :( > > JCO > > J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My Business references & Websites: > http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/jco/ > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
