Dead wrong. The best way to judge a picture is to subject your eyeballs to it. I could care less about how it looks sto an electron microscope. I ignore that aspect of it entirely. A photograph is most usually to be LOOKED at. Not dissected. I do not "scientifically" judge a photograph. Why would one?
I stand by my statements. Others may do as they choose. keith Bruce Rubenstein wrote: > > Judging pictures by looking at them is much too subjective (unless you > are using a scanning electron microscope), so the only way to > scientifically judge a picture is by the numbers. > > BR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >The following is a post on dpreview.com, which I reproduce here FYI. It was > >written by Melvin Sokolsky, not me. Thought some of you might be interested. > > > >--Mike > > > >Stops judging by numbers` learn to trust you eyes` ask your mother which > >picture she would pick. I am sure her taste will transcend the techno-speak > >people. > > > > > >http://www.sokolsky.com/ > ><<<<<<
