Two responses in one... Andre wrote:
> I love this lens and bring it with me most of the time when I travel. > If you can have it for a good price, don't think for too long, or it > won't be there anymore. It's not easy to find one. The last three I > saw sold between 300$ and 400$. That means the one I've found is a bit of a bargain, especially considering its good condition. I've never seen one of these before so they can't be too common in these parts. Bob S. wrote: > I think it's coverage is significantly different from the 24mm. I've been thinking that if I carried this lens I would not be likely to carry the FA 24mm as well. In fact I did consider buying an A24mm f/2.8 which I saw a few weeks back, just for the saving in size and weight when I want to travel light. I decided against that one due to the duplication of focal length. > The 20mm gets really wide. You have to watch what creeps into the > frame (especially when you are more comfortable with telephotos than > wide angles as I am). It would be great paired with the 35mm you > mentioned. I also like using teles but wides are not a problem for me. I already own the Pentax 15mm and am well aware of the problems associated with viewfinders that have indadequate coverage (one of my little peeves). I agree that 20mm and 35mm make a good combination. I'll need to check out the distortion... and also think of whether I really this lens ;) Cheers, - Dave http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
