Well, no, I'd really rather not get into one here. I just HATE to let folks get away with throwing "facts" around like that, without being called upon to... etc. Okay, okay. Sorry. I'll back off and not mention it again. I'll try, Doug, honest!
keith Doug Brewer wrote: > > Do we =really= need to start up another guns/weapons/geopolitical > penis-measuring debate? > > I would vote no. > > At 01:05 PM 1/23/03, you wrote: > > >William Robb wrote: > > > > > What is the time span needed for something to be called a weapon of mass > > > destruction (if we are going to put the term into the language)? > > > A bomb dropped on a city can kill thousands at once, and would qualify. > > > An army using nuclear waste material (inexplicably called depleted uranium) > > > in tank destroying weapons can poison an entire population over a few > > > generations with the fallout from vaporized uranium. > > > >I suppose you can support that hazy assumption? > > > >keith whaley > > > > > Does this count? > > > Or does it have to happen all at once? > > > Just wondering. > > > > > > William Robb
