8000 dpi scan of a 4x5 , I'd love to see a digital beat that any time soon.
--- Bob Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry group, I'm a new lurker, but what has this > email have to do with the > subject. I get the Digest and find myself misled by > the subjects, making it > harder for me to read what I'm interested in. I > don't mean to blame, but > subjects and subjects. > > Bob > > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:15:39 +0100 (CET) > From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Pentax DSLR: e-mail from Pentax USA > Message-Id: > <20030112121540.OPIU28492.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@merlin> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hi Herb > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:25:40 -0500, Herb Chong > wrote: > > > > >i took a one day photo workshop today. the guy > shoots large format 4x5 and > >scans his slides at 8000 dpi, the optical > resolution of his scanner. > >anything less, he says, and he loses quality that > he can tell on his > >exhibition prints, now of which are less than 8x10 > inches. > > If the first sentence are about the same subject, so > you actually mean > 4x5 (inches) slides scanned at 8000 dpi, this guy > must have quite > a large computersystem. > > In my calculations this would result in files > between 1Gb and 4Gb each > depending on color-depth ... > > Hard to swallow for imaging-programs and eating > diskspace like mad ... > > Or do you actually mean 35mm slides ? > > Regards, JvW > > > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months > FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
