"Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 23:21:39 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote: > >>> The ultimate result of camera+lens+photographer is photograph. Again, >>> unless you're serious professional (such as Michael Reichmann of >>> Luminous Landscape), you will keep getting excellent photos with the >>> equipment you have. That for example would mean that if you had 6 MP >>> DSLR that satisfied you, you probably would have little true reason to >>> upgrade to 11 MP DSLR. >> >>I would guess that anyone here who is critical of quality would be keen to >>acquire a Pentax K mount 11MP DSLR (or better), lager files mean more >>flexibility WRT post image manipulation and print sizes. > >Right, plus the fact that it might be full frame.
According to what I've read, any 10+ megapixel camera is likely to be full-frame because at that point the pixel density of the sensor is starting to exceed the resolution capabilities of lenses; there'd be no practical benefit in going to 10 megapixels in an APS-sized sensor. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
