We've had this argument before on the list, take it up with Kodak they
seem to think it can be. Me, I'm neutral.
At 10:33 AM 1/6/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Butch
C-41 processing is similar to processing photo paper in that it can NOT be
pulled or pushed.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax discussion group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: B&W film/developer combinations
>
> � Mike Johnston � <Mike Johnston> wrote :
>
> > Without a doubt, the chromogenic films. Ilford XP-2 is the one I've used
> > mostly. You can shoot portraits at 200, 100, or even 50
>
> The problem is that most of us don't do C41 at home. Should we ask the lab
> for a pull-process when rated at iso 50 or should the standard development
> be fine with 3 stops overexposure ?
>
> The latitude of the film allows you to go up to 3 stops overexposed
without
> compensating on neg development. This works best with digital minilabs
that
> have a separate B&W print function (Fuji Frontier etc.) I have shot little
> of it so I don't know how well a 3 stop overexposed neg would print on
> conventional B&W paper. It doesn't do badly on a digital minilab. On a
non-
> digital minilab the color shifts making it hard to get close to a neutral
> B&W. A properly exposed neg looks good on conventional B&W BTW.
>
> BUTCH
>
> "Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself"
> Hermann Hesse (Demian)
>
>
>
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
