model # ? I wont need ICE/FARE as I'll be scanning new clean negs.
JCO > -----Original Message----- > From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:23 AM > To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner > > > Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Anybody know what is the least expensive > 35mm film scanner that has 4000-4800 dpi > resolution?< > > the Canon seems to be the price leader. no Digital ICE though, something > called FARE instead, and some people report here that enabling that makes > the scanning VERY slow, about 3-4 times as long as i experience with > Digital ICE at the same resolution. > > Herb.... >
