> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > So, I dropped of the roll for processing thinking I'd have a great > demonstration. Between the exposure latitude of 400UC and > the magic of the > Fuji Frontier, I had 10 "acceptable" shots and two fairly > bad ones. Frankly, > if you didn't take some time to examine the 4 or 5 in the > middle, you couldn't > see much difference. The two on the underexposed end are > pretty bad. But the > remainder are all at least usable. -1 through +2 are really good. > > If I just handed you the 12 prints and told you to put them > in order, it would > take you a while. > > Just for grins, I re-scanned the negs myself. +1 through -1 > came out just > fine. +4 through -3 looked pretty usable. Of the whole > set, -5 and -6 were > the only ones the really looked like you couldn't pull > something out of the > shadows or correct the color to something believable.
The underexposure I experienced was slight. All the shots were usable, there was just a slight bit of muddiness. I bought a few more rolls today for a flower shoot I have tomorrow. I'll probably shoot it at 250. tv
