If I had to guess, I'd say the "average" USA Pentax enthusiast got the camera and lens as a gift and uses it 3 times a year. I don't think that fits this group.
Lon frank theriault wrote: > > Even if they do "monitor" us once in a while, or even all the time, I can't > believe that they put much stock in our opinions. We're what, a couple of hundred > enthusiasts? That's a pretty small sample, and hardly representative of the > market as a whole. We don't have much influence beyond our group (or even within > it <g>). They may watch us once in a while, but I can't believe that too many > decisions are made based on what we think. > > BUT, just in case Big Brother Pentax is watching, how about a Pentax equivalent to > the N**** FM3 (but way cheaper)? I guess it could hurt to try, eh? <vbg> > > cheers, > frank > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > I work in advertising and have had a lot of contact with the marketing > > departments of various companies for the last quarter century. They all > > monitor every bit of information they can find. Why not? It's a no > > brainer. More information is always a good thing. > > Paul > > > > -- > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears > it is true." -J. Robert > Oppenheimer
