How do you assess K24/2.8 lens? Alek Użytkownik Jonathan Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >I will second the comments Andre made concerning the K >35/3.5. It is one hell of a sharp lens with >practically no flare at all. I have comtemplated >replacing it with one of Pentax's f2 versions, but I >can't really justify two 35's and I'm NOT getting rid >of my K 35/3.5. It is the lightest of their 35's, >albeit slightly larger than the M/A types. The slow >speed is somewhat compensated for by the fact that it >is still amazingly sharp at full aperture. > >I find myself using this lens more and more for the >fine detail and overall brilliance of the pictures it >produces. It is well worth the $95 USD that I paid for >it in like new condition. Admittedly I use my K 24/2.8 >far more often because I like its angle of view and >brighter image in the finder, but the K 35/3.5 ~is~ >indeed in an a special optical class above most other >lenses I've used. > >-Jonathan- > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. >http://mailplus.yahoo.com > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
Święta tuż tuż! http://swieta.onet.pl
