Mark - I know it exists also because I own two. You may recall, this is the
lens about which I wrote last week or so, asking about a repair to the front
group (the two elements coming unglued). My good one is a very fine lens. I
bought the F100 f2.8 for the one-stop speed advantage, but I still use the
f4 on my LX, the f2.8 only on my PZ.
I am in the middle of a long involved computer swap. Once things settle,
first priority is to do key updates to my lens-opinion site, and while there
I will see about adding some 100 f/4.0 information. (Earlier this evening I
recovered my web editor, and through trial and error I was able to recover
my log-in name, etc., so I am almost back in business). Second priority, as
soon as the SCSI-to-USB dongle arrives, is to scan some of my accumulated
photos. At that point I'll put up some comparisons of similar macro shots
(dead leaves, still on the tree, coated with freezing rain, back lit and
otherwise) taken with the f/4.0, the f/2.8, and the 645-120mm f/4.0.
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: RobertsTech.com
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:05:15 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: M 100/4.0 macro
>
>
> Anyone have any experience with the SMC-M 100/f4.0 Macro?
>
> Boz's page lists the dental version but not the standard M
> version. (Perhaps the dental version was the *only* M-series
> 100/4.0 macro?) Stan's Pentax page doesn't show any 100/4.0
> lenses at all.
> I'm puzzled. (I've seen one so I know it exists!)
>
> Mark
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
