Rob Studdert wrote:------------
On 13 Feb 2001, at 14:05, Wieland Willker wrote:
> Alexander Krohe wrote:
> > Speaking about the MX, this distance is definitely
too
> > short. The viewing distance of the aperture
indication
> > is way too short.
>
>
> What is too short? I don't understand this. Should
it be farther away? Why? I can
>see and
> read it perfectly.
Wieland,
Alexander has a problem with the apparent distance of
the aperture
indicators through the finder, I would assume that you
don't find it
uncomfortable at all, maybe you are a bit short
sighted and Alexander is a
little long sighted :-) Its all to do with comfort,
the apparent viewing distance
can be critical in this area, it is not a function of
eye-point as such.
----------------------------------
MY REPLY:
Exactly. Thanks for clarifying. BTW the viewfinders of
the LX, K-Series and the MZ cameras don't cause
similar problems to me (except that the viewfinder
indications of the MZ's are too small).
I think the FE-1 viewfinder of the LX is the best
viewfinder of all Pentax cameras, both in terms of
relaxed viewing and of precise focusing.
Enjoy,
Alexander
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
