Could this be partially because they tend to be used far more
heavily than most cameras? Of course the use of that nasty
deteriorating foam also has something to do with it.
--Tom
Chris Brogden wrote:
>
> inside. Prepare another $200 for future repair is not a bad idea.
>
> >From what I've heard about LX's, this isn't a bad idea. For some reason,
> LX's and MX's seem to have more problems than most Pentax bodies, though
> I'm sure there are the usual exceptions that prove the rule. :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
