The only thing that might help is to publish it in the FAQ and then put a
copy of the FAQ in the welcome message to new subscribers, and then post the
FAQ here on the list every day. Then there'd still be people asking the same
questions. It's a fact of life, some people will not try to help themselves
and must be spoon-fed everything. Others just need a pointer to get them
going in the right direction. Some people won't make a decision on even
trivial purchases without calling for a round of opinions from everyone on
the list, and some quietly do their homework and make their decisions.
There isn't a list that I know about that's any different. This is as good
as it gets.
Len
---
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Skorepa Michal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 7:52 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Compatibility table
>
>
> Hi all,
> I have been watching PDML for some time now and have come
> across already
> quite a few questions regarding the compatibility and
> communication between
> various lenses and various bodies. Usually, quite a few knowledgeable
> pentax-users reply (sometimes in slightly different ways).
> Would it be too
> time-demanding for one of you, long-time pentaxers, to
> produce and put on
> the web a table with bodies in the rows and lenses in the
> columns ? Each
> cell would then contain symbols for "does not fit at all",
> "TTL metering
> impossible" etc. After that, others could have a look at the table and
> suggest corrections or additions. I would love to do it
> myself but I am much
> too new to Pentax. (Bojidar Dimitrov's Pentax K-Mount
> Equipment Page is
> surely great but it lists lenses and bodies separately).
> Such a scheme would help answer once forever most
> compatibility questions in
> advance!
> Thanks,
> Michal
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit www.pdml.net
and follow the directions.
