On 8 May 2017, at 21:00, [email protected] wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 16:51:42 +0100
From: Marty Strong <[email protected]>
To: Denis Fondras <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PDB Tech] Are we ready for the next step in IP
management ?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
The preferred way is to mark the RS ASN as “Route Server” e.g.:
https://www.peeringdb.com/net/9510
Regards,
Marty Strong
--------------------------------------
Hi,
I have spent some time digging around this problem.
Currently the ixlan-object has an empty or zeroed rs_asn value. For
safer and faster auto-processing it might be necessary to set it to the
correct IX-ASN.
E.g. the code under
https://github.com/ipcjk/ixgen/blob/master/ixworkers/ixworkers.go#L34
will search the peering members and then will compare the peering ASN
object to the ‚Route Server‘-type to auto-configure route-servers.
This will work great, till somebody marks his network as ‚route
server’ because we don’t know the correct target ASN.
Jörg
_______________________________________________
Pdb-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
