It should be required. Thanks! Cheers! [email protected]
*NOTE* [email protected] often responds to pending activations faster than I do! Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus > On Dec 25, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Sometimes people want to disclose their presence at an Internet > Exchange, but don't want to disclose their IP address. > > Should PeeringDB allow the IPv4 and IPv6 field to be either of the > following? > > "a valid globally unique IP address" > "" (empty) > > Or should PDB only accept valid globally unique IP addresses as value > for the IP Field? > > It appears we've gone back and forth between allowing empty and not > allowing empty as is visible here: https://www.peeringdb.com/ix/1138 > (currently empty is not allowed). > > An argument against 'empty' is that from an automation perspective the > 'empty' value is quite useless. > > Based on the outcome of this discussion I'd like to either clean up the > database, or popularise the use of the 'empty ip field' where > applicable. > > Kind regards, > > Job > _______________________________________________ > Pdb-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
_______________________________________________ Pdb-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
