Added:
https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/72
Chris
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Caputo wrote:
> Slightly related: It would be nice if in addition to the Peer Name column,
> the IPv4/IPv6 column and the Speed column could have natural sorts
> available. (Natural sort by IPv4 addr, rather than IPv6 addr, unless IPv6
> is put into a separate column.)
>
> Chris
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Matt Griswold wrote:
> > Agreed, not sure how that got in, made
> > https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/71 and will check it out /
> > add better tests.
> >
> >
> > On Oct 4, 2016 3:46 PM, "Arnold Nipper" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 04.10.2016 22:29, Chris Caputo wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> > >> On 04.10.2016 18:53, James Bensley wrote:
> > >>> On 13 September 2016 at 11:00, Stefan Pratter <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you for bringing this to our attention, i have opened a
> > github ticket
> > >>>> for it here:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/68
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Stefan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Whilst playing the the PDB API some more I have found another
> > "issue".
> > >>> It's not an issue with the API as such but perhaps a feature
> > request;
> > >>> there seems to be no duplication detection.
> > >>>
> > >>> I was trying to automate some stuff at this IX:
> > https://www.peeringdb.com/ix/745
> > >>>
> > >>> If you look there are two peers listed at that exchange with the
> > same
> > >>> IPv4 address (AS 8468 and AS 60688, both with IP 195.66.246.11).
> > This
> > >>> kind of thing should be easily detectable. Any scope for this
> > sort of
> > >>> function to be added, where the AS number and company are
> > different
> > >>> there shouldn't be a matching IP, the IP can only be announced by
> > one
> > >>> AS number at an exchange.
> > >>
> > >> Woow ... how could this happen? Afaik it is not possible to add an
> > IP
> > >> twice or even more often.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for spotting. We will follow up with LINX to sort out the
> > issue.
> > >
> > > It is possible. We just had someone do this at the SIX in the past
> > week.
> > > They added our route server addresses, which were registered
> > already in
> > > PeeringDB.
> > >
> >
> > Definitely a severe bug imho and should be fixed immediately. I'm
> > really
> > astonished that this pops up only now.
> >
> >
> > Arnold
> > --
> > Arnold Nipper
> > Chief Technology Evangelist and Co-Founder
> >
> > DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main |
> > Germany | www.de-cix.net | Phone +49 69 1730902 22 |
> > Mobile +49 172 2650958 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 |
> > [email protected] | Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa |
> > Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135
_______________________________________________
Pdb-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
