Hi WG, As co-author, I support the progress.
For reviewers - please make sure that you are reading latest version (version 20) since the draft was updated based on comments received (thanks a lot for those). Regards, Samuel From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 3 March 2026 at 05:17 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19 (Ends 2026-02-24) Hi WG, The chairs decided to keep the WG LC open for an additional week. The WGLC will now end on 2026-03-10. We recognize that this period has been busy leading up to the IETF 125 draft deadline and want to ensure the group has adequate time to review and respond. Please use this additional time to provide your feedback on the mailing list. As a reminder, it is important for the working group to be explicit on the list. If you support publication of this document, please state: * You have read the latest version, and * In your opinion, it is ready for publication. As always, review comments are appreciated. Responses to the WGLC thread are essential to help the chairs determine consensus. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:56 PM Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This message starts a WG Last Call for: draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19 This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-02-24 Abstract: Certain traffic engineering path computation problems require solutions that consist of multiple traffic paths that together form a solution. However, current PCEP extensions can only return a single traffic path, which cannot meet the requirements. This document defines mechanisms to encode multiple paths for a single set of objectives and constraints. This allows encoding of multiple Segment Lists per Candidate Path within a Segment Routing Policy. The new Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) mechanisms are designed to be generic, which allows for future re-use outside of SR Policy. The new PCEP mechanisms are applicable to both stateless and stateful PCEP. Additionally, this document updates RFC 8231 and RFC 8281 to allow encoding of multiple Segment Lists in PCEP. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft on the mailing list. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and that it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-multipath/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-multipath-19
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
