Hi WG,
I have read this document and I support the publication.
But I have a minor suggestion about the SA object in section 4.
If the Frequency Slot Selection TLV and Frequency Slot Restriction Constraint
TLV are the optional TLVs, I suggest to remove them in Figure 2 as following
shown.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Reserved | Flags |M|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
// Optional TLVs //
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: SA Object
Thanks,
Quan
<Hi all,
<This email starts a 2-week WG last call for
<draft-ietf-pce-flexible-grid-11 [1]. Please review and share your
<comments using the PCE mailing list. Even a short feedback will be
<appreciated.
<This WGLC will end on Wednesday 7th May 2025.
<Thanks,
<Dhruv & Julien
--
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-flexible-grid/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
