Yes please! On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 2:06 PM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > I missed this erratum for some reason. > > I believe this is correct and I am inclined to Verify this unless there is > any objection from the WG (to make sure I am not missing something). > > Thanks, > Ketan > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8231, > "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for > Stateful PCE". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and > at:https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8370 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Samuel Sidor <ssi...@cisco.com> <<ssi...@cisco.com>> > > Section: 7.3.4 > > Original Text > ------------- > Length (16 bits): indicates the total length of the TLV in octets. > The TLV MUST be zero-padded so that the TLV is 4-octet aligned. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Length (16 bits): indicates the length of the value portion of the TLV in > octets. The TLV MUST be zero-padded so that the TLV is 4-octet aligned. > > Notes > ----- > The "total length of the TLV" is incorrect, as in PCEP the TLV formatting is > as per RFC 5440 which requires the length to be of the value portion only > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5440#section-7.1) > > Similar mistake was already fixed for different TLV in same RFC as part > of:https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6289 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8231 (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-21) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) > Extensions for Stateful PCE > Publication Date : September 2017 > Author(s) : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, J. Medved, R. Varga > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Path Computation Element > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
