Hi Mahesh, > On Feb 11, 2025, at 10:06 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker > <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > I was also piqued by the comment from the authors that "Given that the > document > has reached this stage, it is safe to assume that there was consensus in the > WG > to use this TLV. AFAIK there was no discussion or debate during the WG process > on whether the draft could have used an alternative encoding mechanism." If > the > discussion never happened, how can we claim that there was consensus in the > WG?
I don’t think our process requires that a WG explore the entire potential solution space (which is often very large, even if only considering reasonable solutions) before reaching consensus to use a particular solution. Nor should it. —John _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
