Hi Dmytro, In “draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp”, you can see Implementation section, which is mentioning 2 vendors, which implemented support and there were interoperability tests done on EANTC 2024 with implementations between multiple vendors (look for “Colored Path Computing and Signaling” in test results).
For “draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color”, I believe that it was originally introduced only for enabling usage of color for RSVP-TE LPSs and support for SR was allowed only recently (~3 months ago): https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-04&url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-05&difftype=--html So most likely it is not adopted by that many vendors, but authors of that draft can share more details. Regards, Samuel From: Dmytro Shypovalov <d...@routingcraft.net> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 1:59 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] SR policy color in PCEP practical implementations? Dear PCE experts, Apologies if this is off topic for this mailer list as my question is not about the standard per se but about vendor implementations. Currently there are 2 competing drafts to advertise SR policy color: 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-08 2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-20 Do you know if any of the vendors implemented either of those on the PCC side? And more broadly, which one of these drafts will the industry go ahead with? As a PCE developer, I want to ensure best compatibility with all vendors. So far the implementations I tested don't understand either of those TLVs/objects, and the association object leads to some errors/crashes/hangs. Regards, Dmytro
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
