Hi WG,

Please find the WG status as presented in the PCE WG session -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-pce-1-introduction-01.pdf

Please feel free to update the status on any of your WG I-D on the mailing
list.
We maintain the overall status on the WG wiki -
https://wiki.ietf.org/group/pce

   - Beyond the WG
      - 2 new RFCs since IETF 120
         - RFC9603 - PCEP for SRv6
         - RFC9604 - BSID
      - 2 I-Ds in the RFC Editor Queue
         - draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13 (MISSREF)
            - Waiting for draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis (post WGLC)
         - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip (MISSREF)
            - Waiting for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update (in IETF-LC)
         - 5 I-Ds with the ADs
         - draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-10 (2024-04-16; on
         telechat; Roman)
         - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-26 (2024-05-22; AD Eval; Gunter)
         - draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18 (2024-07-05; In
         IETF-LC; Roman)
         - draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10 (2024-08-28; on telechat;
         Roman)
         - draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-02 (2024-10-07; IETF-LC done, waiting
         on AD; John)
      - Early IANA Allocation
   - draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp
         - (1) Renewed and Expires 2025-03-30
         - (2) Expires 2025-02-13
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip
         - Renewed and Expires 2025-08-14
      - draft-ietf-pce-multipath
         - Renewed and Expires 2025-05-09
      - draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo
         - (1) Renewed and Expires 2025-09-13
         - (2) Expires 2025-07-30
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color
         - Expires 2024-10-30
         - Renewal in progress
      - draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path
         - Expires 2024-11-30
      - draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions
         - Expires 2025-02-23
      - draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09
      - Expires 2025-08-27
      - Errata
   - No new Errata
   - Liaison
      - New Liason https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1963/
         - From ETSI-ISG-F5G
            - To ccamp, pce, RTG, teas
            - regarding Optical Cloud Network (OCN) based on underlay
            Optical Transport Network (OTN) for F5G Advanced
Architecture to improve
            and evolve the E2E optical fixed network architecture
         - https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1936/ is pending
            - From ITU-T-SG-15
            - To ccamp, mpls, pals, pce, teas
            - Requesting for updates to the material after Issue 34 of the
            OTNT SWP, the latest version updated by the SG15 during a
plenary meeting
            in July 2024.
            - Deadline 2025-03-03
         - Post WGLC
   - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color
         - -05 posted on 2024-10-21
         - Thanks Andrew for Shepherding this!
         - Applicable for both RSVP-TE and SR
         - Ignored in case of SR-Policy association
         - New Error codes
         - Another version might be needed before pushing it off to the AD
      - In queue for WGLC
   - draft-ietf-pce-flexible-grid
         - -10 posted on 2024-07-05
         - There are pending comments and need for a cleanup!
         - No update since last IETF meeting!
      - draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path
         - -14 posted on 2024-08-11
         - A refresh
         - Ready for WGLC!
      - draft-ietf-pce-state-sync
         - -09 posted on 2024-10-21
         - Handled comments from Adrian
         - Update needed, merge the proposed text from Dhruv for new
         notifications as discussed earlier!
      - draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo
         - -14 posted on 2024-09-25
         - Ready for WGLC! - next in our queue!
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr
         - -09 posted on 2024-07-04
         - Ready for WGLC!
      - “Nearing” WGLC
      - draft-ietf-pce-sr-path- segment
         - -12 posted on 2024-10-14
         - Allow the Path Segment TLV to be also included in Path
         Attributes Object for multi-path handling
         - Nearing WGLC?
         - Has normative dependencies
      - draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions
         - -06 posted on 2024-09-03
         - On the agenda
      - draft-ietf-pce-entropy-label-position
         - -02 posted on 2024-09-19
         - Implementation section missing
         - Otherwise, seems ready for WGLC!
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls
         - -02 posted on 2024-10-20
         - Adrians comment on “experimental” status
         - A new subsection “Evaluation of the Experiment” added
         - Ready for WGLC?
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ifit
         - -05 posted on 2024-07-05
         - Implementation section missing
         - Otherwise, seems ready for WGLC!
      - WG I-Ds
   - draft-ietf-pce-stateful- interdomain
         - -05 posted on 2024-07-05
         - A major update made that needs review!
      - draft-ietf-pce-multipath
         - -12 posted on 2024-10-08
         - Should the PCEP extension go beyond the SR Policy SPRING’s SR
         Policy RFC?
      - draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy
         - -09 posted on 2024-08-02
         - Update to IANA Consideration
         - Comments from IETF 119/120 are not yet handled
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec
         - -06 posted on 2024-06-19
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-pmtu
         - -06 posted on 2024-07-08
         - No update
         - Waiting on Spring WG I-D
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-srv6-yang
         - -06 posted on 2024-10-19
         - Aligned with PCEP YANG changes
      - draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
         - -03 posted on 2024-08-18
         - Editorial changes
         - Ready for WGLC?
      - draft-ietf-pce-bier-te
         - -01 posted on 2024-10-10
         - A major update made that needs review!
      - draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space
         - -01 posted on 2024-10-21
         - During IETF 120 it was decided to continue to use Open message
         - A new draft (which is on the agenda) handles updates to Open
         message information
         - WG adoption comments are handled
         - Should there be separate TLV for SRGB and SRLB?
         - Authors: No, the SRGB and SRLB configurations of the node is
         done independently, it is advertised independently via
IGP/BGP-LS.  The
         label range that is set aside is orthogonal to it.
      - WG Adoption Poll Queue
   - Refer to https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/pce#wg-adoption-call-queue
      - draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update - Adoption poll started
      on 7th Oct 2024
         - Still open, be vocal, it is a small I-D!
      - draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-paramters
      - draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp
      - draft-koldychev-pce-operational (need to break into 2 drafts) -
      expired
         - Chairs would like to move the clarification informational I-D
         fast…
      - draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification
      - draft-chen-pce-sr-ingress-protection - expired
      - draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp
      - draft-wang-pce-vlan-based-traffic-forwarding

Thanks!
PCE Chairs
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to