Hi PCE, We have updated the draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space draft according to the comments received in the WG adoption call and previous meeting. Please see the difference: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space-00&url2=draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space-01&difftype=--html
According to the discussion in the previous meeting https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/120/materials/minutes-120-pce-202407252200-02 , we will discuss the general extension in a new draft, and we did propose a new draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stone-pce-update-open/, please review, and comments are welcome. Updates to address the comments from experts below: l Gyan: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ij5UKdcJ9juUoVosTs2kdnnv_BE/ added an Appendix B in the draft. The current answer is no. We do not need to do so. l Jimmy Dong: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/EkfD1YjqVj6lzDw1jA7tXpKCyLI/ solved, a new draft has been proposed. l Ran Chen: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/nIcse0ukeUt1ZQHH9PkPjDahbeY/: addressed in this update. l Quan Xiong: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/sL6IvFmi1Ip2ALF-E0CXrkFaJKQ/ : addressed in IETF120 discussion and this update.. l Adrian: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/mS__kHS8tzq2iaavmomcrIq1fgw/, discussed off-line, and agreed on keeping the TLV format now. l Samuel: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/td9YKCr9Ya4ElZCE8Kyku97Ap7U/: addressed in IETF120 discussion and this update.. Thanks, Cheng
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
