Hi Roman, On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:43 PM Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote:
> Hi! > > I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09. To > help load-balance document queues, I'm taking over a responsible AD for > this document. Thanks for the work on this document. > > Dhruv: Thank you for helping out! > I only have the following feedback which can be addressed with IETF LC > feedback: > > ** Section 3.2.1 > When the P flag is set in the PCRpt message > received on a PCEP session on which the R bit was set by both peers, > the object SHOULD be taken into account by the PCE. > > What does this “SHOULD” mean here? Shouldn’t the PCE always take the > message into account but a local policy might override it? > > Dhruv: The SHOULD is because of the delegation feature as described in section 3.2.1.1 where even though the P flag is set for the object, PCE could choose to ignore it for delegated LSPs. Thanks! Dhruv (Document Shepherd) > Regards, > Roman > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
