Hi WG, We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early allocation process.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:53 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors of > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp for an early code point allocation > for the codepoints listed in - > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.2 > (TBD1-4) > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.3 > (TBD6-8) > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.4 > (TBD9) > > Note that there was an earlier allocation request where some codepoints > were already allocated by IANA - > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/8GtjtxNWeA9MxpySx6J7XZKmlUc/ > Note that the draft is also undergoing a parallel WGLC - > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ert_k7k5iYq3LWbaTc-aMwRRAbs/ > > RFC 7120 requires one to meet the following criteria to proceed: > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria or believes > that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send > an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If the chairs hear no > objections by Wednesday, Jan 24th, we will kick off the early allocation > request. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
