I support the adoption of pcep extension to support circuit style sr
policy.  I don’t see any issues with the draft that need to be fixed  and I
am willing to work on the draft.

Thanks

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*



On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 5:33 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons -
> Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you
> willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
>
> Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023.
>
> Please be more vocal during WG polls!
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to