Hi Qin, 
Thanks for addressing my comment. Additionally, I think we have enough support 
to accept this as a WG document (even w/o the formal endorsement of the PCE WG 
__
Thanks,
Acee

On 11/29/18, 1:34 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Qin Wu" <[email protected] on 
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    v-01 has just been posted to address received comments so far.
    The diff is:
    
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01
    
    -Qin
    -----邮件原件-----
    发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 
[email protected]
    发送时间: 2018年11月29日 14:29
    收件人: [email protected]
    主题: I-D Action: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01.txt
    
    
    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
    
    
            Title           : IGP extension for PCEP security capability 
support in the PCE discovery
            Authors         : Diego R. Lopez
                              Qin Wu
                              Dhruv Dhody
                              Michael Wang
                              Daniel King
        Filename        : draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01.txt
        Pages           : 10
        Date            : 2018-11-28
    
    Abstract:
       When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router
       (LSR) participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), or even a
       server participating in IGP, its presence and path computation
       capabilities can be advertised using IGP flooding.  The IGP
       extensions for PCE discovery (RFC 5088 and RFC 5089) define a method
       to advertise path computation capabilities using IGP flooding for
       OSPF and IS-IS respectively.  However these specifications lack a
       method to advertise PCEP security (e.g., Transport Layer
       Security(TLS), TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO)) support
       capability.
    
       This document proposes new capability flag bits for PCE-CAP-FLAGS
       sub-TLV that can be announced as attribute in the IGP advertisement
       to distribute PCEP security support information.  In addition, this
       document updates RFC 5088 and RFC 5089 to allow advertisement of Key
       ID or Key Chain Name Sub-TLV to support TCP AO security capability.
    
    
    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
    
    There are also htmlized versions available at:
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01
    
    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01
    
    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    
    _______________________________________________
    I-D-Announce mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
    Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or 
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to