On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:35:19AM -0500, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > Hi, Jonathan, > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Hardwick < > jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > > > Hi Spencer > > > > Thanks for your comments. Please see [Jon] below. > > > > Cheers > > Jon > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 03 April 2018 03:23 > > > > [Jon] I have proposed an update to Benjamin. The draft does not need any > > sub-TLVs, hence there are no examples, which has been a frequent pattern in > > PCE RFCs since the working group got started! Having said that, we could > > immediately point to the first real example of a PST sub-TLV by providing > > an informative reference to draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing. I don't see > > a problem doing this as the documents were always intended to be published > > together. How about > > > > OLD > > This document does not define any sub-TLVs. > > NEW > > This document does not define any sub-TLVs; an example can be found in > > [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing]. > > END > > > > Since I was echoing Benjamin's concern, I'll echo his relief - whatever you > folks work out, will work for me. > > But that sounds like a fine plan to me.
Having this additional informational reference also sounds good to me. -Benjamin _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
