> On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:32 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ben, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell >> Sent: 29 August 2017 08:18 >> To: The IESG <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: [Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: >> (with COMMENT) >> >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Is section 2 expected to be of more than background interest to an >> implementer? >> If not, I suggest moving it to an appendix, or at least towards the back >> of the document. >> > [[Dhruv Dhody]] This is as per the earlier published RFC. This section has > not changed in the bis document. > Including a requirement section was quite usual in the PCEP RFCs published > earlier, I know that in the recent times this is discouraged. > > In the case of bis document, there is some value in keeping the spirit and > order of the original RFC, so that a clear comparison with the > to-be-obsolute-RFC is possible. > Do you agree, if not I can move as suggested.
I agree, it makes since to leave it as it was in the original. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
