|
Hi Cyril, hi Adrian, Don't worry, even though we missed several datatracker cycles, the I-D isn't forgotten and a shepherd has been appointed: me. ;-) The chairs had decided to apply WFQ over the I-D processing queue. Considering the low pressure product implementers put on the interoperability along this I-D (feedback to the chairs welcome on that), it got preempted to free bandwidth for the stateful I-Ds and the associated codepoint clash. Now that these are with the IESG, I should be able to share my review soon (i.e., by next IETF). Regards, Julien Apr. 11, 2017 - [email protected]:
|
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
