Hi Cyril, hi Adrian,

Don't worry, even though we missed several datatracker cycles, the I-D isn't forgotten and a shepherd has been appointed: me. ;-)

The chairs had decided to apply WFQ over the I-D processing queue. Considering the low pressure product implementers put on the interoperability along this I-D (feedback to the chairs welcome on that), it got preempted to free bandwidth for the stateful I-Ds and the associated codepoint clash. Now that these are with the IESG, I should be able to share my review soon (i.e., by next IETF).

Regards,

Julien


Apr. 11, 2017 - [email protected]:

Hi, 


From what I can recall, there was no comment pending. Grep'ing through my archives I found : the following last messages regarding the gmpls draft are :


Other comments addressed : https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3oswQvIe4THUtUSUnXwKfmfeVmg, also reflected in https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-pce-0.pdf


WG comments addressed: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vPZsnrCy4kh7H8VaMDz6I-XI8uw



The document status from the slides is Shepherd assigned.


I will be happy to address any actions that I can complete on my side.


Cyril


From: Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:40:28 PM
 
Thanks Jon!

Looks like I need to chivvy the authors of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.

But, oh look! It has expired. A year ago!

Wow! Any archaeologists out there want to dig through the mail archive to find
out what needed to be done?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 April 2017 08:37
>
> Hi Adrian
>
> Thanks for checking.  This draft depends normatively on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-
> pcep-extensions, which I believe still has some actions to be completed.  Our
plan
> is to advance both together.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 07 April 2017 18:33
>
> Hi,
>
> Did https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext disappear
> down a crack?
>
> Looks like WG last call completed and the draft was updated.
> Also the shepherd write-up was updated.
>
> Does the big red button need to be pressed to send this to the AD?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to