Dear Authors,
Suggested TLV values conflict with in other PCE drafts. I could find 2
conflicts, there may be more. Is there a way the PCE WG can manage TLV
values across drafts? For compatibility between vendors and different
software release from same vendor - keeping these values unchanged is
critical.
8.3. STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV
*TBD11 (suggested* value 26) TRIGGERED-INITIAL-SYNC This document
* TBD12 (suggested* value 28) TRIGGERED-RESYNC This document
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08#section-9.4 -
SR-PCE-CAPABILITY is 26
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-03#section-6.1
PATH-SETUP-TYPE is 28
Thanks,
Girish
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:08 AM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.
>
> Title : Optimizations of Label Switched Path State
> Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE
> Authors : Edward Crabbe
> Ina Minei
> Jan Medved
> Robert Varga
> Xian Zhang
> Dhruv Dhody
> Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-
> optimizations-09.txt
> Pages : 25
> Date : 2017-02-28
>
> Abstract:
> A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) has access to not only the
> information disseminated by the network's Interior Gateway Protocol
> (IGP), but also the set of active paths and their reserved resources
> for its computation. The additional Label Switched Path (LSP) state
> information allows the PCE to compute constrained paths while
> considering individual LSPs and their interactions. This requires a
> state synchronization mechanism between the PCE and the network, PCE
> and path computation clients (PCCs), and between cooperating PCEs.
> The basic mechanism for state synchronization is part of the stateful
> PCE specification. This document presents motivations for
> optimizations to the base state synchronization procedure and
> specifies the required Path Computation Element Communication
> Protocol (PCEP) extensions.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-
> sync-optimizations/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-
> sync-optimizations-09
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
