Support, thanks,

AB

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Leeyoung <[email protected]> wrote:

> Support,
>
> Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 4:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
>
> Hi all,
>
> During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear
> consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now
> need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do
> you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE
> WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not
> support the adoption.
>
> Thanks,
>
> JP, Jon & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to