Hi WG,

This update handles the comments from Chris, as part of the Routing Directorate 
Review [1]. 
Another change is in section 6.3 where the repeating of the format of the PCRpt 
message is removed from this document. See diff [2].

Regards,
Dhruv

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ax1owmoifKFXsjlMJQXczyq8T64
[2] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: 18 August 2016 10:55
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to compute service aware Label Switched Path
> (LSP).
>         Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Vishwas Manral
>                           Zafar Ali
>                           Kenji Kumaki
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt
>       Pages           : 28
>       Date            : 2016-08-17
> 
> Abstract:
>    In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
>    information networks (e.g. stock market data providers), network
>    performance criteria (e.g. latency) are becoming as critical to data
>    path selection as other metrics and constraints.  These metrics are
>    associated with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) between customers
>    and service providers.  The link bandwidth utilization (the total
>    bandwidth of a link in current use for the forwarding) is another
>    important factor to consider during path computation.
> 
>    IGP Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric extensions describe mechanisms
>    with which network performance information is distributed via OSPF
>    and IS-IS respectively.  The Path Computation Element Communication
>    Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements
>    (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation
>    Clients (PCCs) requests.  This document describes the extension to
>    PCEP to carry latency, delay variation, packet loss and link
>    bandwidth utilization as constraints for end to end path computation.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to