On 04/08/2016 07:04 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, Hello,
> I fully agree that stateful PCE draft needs to be more clear about how a > PCC retrieves a path when the delegation starts and the LSP has just > been configured (does it need to compute locally first and then > delegate, or do PCReq as Olivier proposed …). RFC5440's spirit is that the PCC is the ultimate owner of LSP state. I do believe both behaviors are valid and should be a matter of local PCC policy rather than protocol specification. > I want to add my voice to what Olivier said about the inconsistent > behaviors we see today in implementations leading to lack of > interoperability. Does this statement refer to multiple PCE implementations or multiple PCC implementations? Thanks, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
