Hi Adrian.

So far, we have received little feedback from implementers of RFC 7150. At this stage, even if the consensus is that the change should have been avoided, the _expressed_ impact is limited. We will thus proceed to WG last call.

JP & Julien


Aug. 08, 2014 - Adrian Farrel:
Hi chairs,

Are we going to go ahead with this?
Do we need any further confirmation from the WG about vendor constraints 
implementation?

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 30 July 2014 14:21

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis
Revision:       01
Title:          Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation
Element communication Protocol
Document date:  2014-07-30
Group:          pce
Pages:          12
URL:            
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01

Abstract:
    The Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) is used to
    convey path computation requests and responses both between Path
    Computation Clients (PCCs) and Path Computation Elements (PCEs) and
    between cooperating PCEs.  In PCEP, the path computation requests
    carry details of the constraints and objective functions that the PCC
    wishes the PCE to apply in its computation.

    This document defines a facility to carry vendor-specific information
    in PCEP using a dedicated object and a new Type-Length-Value (TLV)
    that can be carried in any PCEP object that supports TLVs.

    This document obsoletes RFC 7150.  The only changes from that
    document are a clarification of the use of the new Type-Length-Value
    and the allocation of a different code point for the VENDOR-
    INFORMATION object.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to