Support On 3/4/14, 7:35 PM, "Avantika" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Support > >-----Original Message----- >From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric >Sent: 04 March 2014 23:42 >To: [email protected] >Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as >PCE WG Document? > >Dear WG, > >As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for >adopting draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item. > >Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of >adopting it as a WG document? > >Thanks. > >JP and Julien. > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
