Support

JonathanS adler

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel 
King
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

Hi All, 

I support H-PCE, although I am  an author of said document.  

Br, Dan.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: 20 September 2011 16:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

Hi PCE WG.

The framework for hierarchical PCE has been there for long, discussed
several times and was pending the charter update. This is a poll for
adopting draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06 as WG document. Please reply to
this message to express either your support, i.e. you consider the I-D is a
good foundation to address the issue, or your objection, which you are
expected to clarify.

Thank you,

JP & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to