Hi Young.
Thank you for your feedback. With respect to the criteria described in
the companion e-mail sent today to the list, a slot has been allocated
for the WG I-D about WSON requirements. For the other documents, please
use the mailing list as much as possible to trigger technical discussion
and build consensus: if no blocking issue is faced, there is no reason
to consume meeting time so as to make progress.
Thanks,
JP & Julien
Le 13/07/2011 17:48, Leeyoung a écrit :
Hi J-P and Julien,
I have made requests for time slots for three presentations before,
but I just wanted to make sure our presentation fits to the
criteria.
* PCE requirement for WSON RWA.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength/
(5 min, presenter: Young)
PCE requirment for RWA (working group document) - we request for 5
minutes to give the update newly added requirement (signal
compatibility/processing) to align with the extension draft --- Last
time, I asked for the WG LC and Julien asked me to align with the
solution draft to make sure all the requirements are covered and this
revision has fulfilled it. The co-authors believe this draft is ready
for WG LC.
* PCEP extension for WSON RWA.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext/ (5 min,
presenter: Oscar)
We have much private discussions on PCEP ext. for RWA in WSON among
the co-authors to make sure we'd avoid duplicate effort from the PCEP
ext for GMPLS. It is worth to present the progress. If you want, we
can forward the thread of emails on this discussion. Please let me
know if that is necessary.
* PCEP extensions for WSON Impairments.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-wson-impairments/ (5
min, presenter: Young)
In regards to Impairment-aware PCE, we have discussions in CCAMP
mailing list on this topic and the PCE mailing list was also CC'ed
for some of the discussions Julien raised on the PCE related things
on the Impairment Framework. We have cut down many of the PCE related
portion from the framework document in this new revision, so please
give us 5 minutes for the update.
------------------------- *From:* [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *JP Vasseur *Sent:*
Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:07 AM *To:* [email protected] *Cc:* Daniel
King *Subject:* [Pce] Rules to request a "slot" during PCE WG
Meetings
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better
>> manage our WG meeting time.
>>
>> As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to
>> IDs that were already "presented" during previous IETF meetings,
>> refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without
>> discussion on the mailing list ...
>>
>> As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to */discuss/*
>> open issues that could not be resolved by email attempting to
>> reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list.
>>
>> You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had
>> during the Routing Area meeting at the last IETF.
>>
>> Few points here: 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is
>> perfectly fine to get a "presentation" slot when first posted
>> (rev -00) if time permits (priority will be given to slots
>> allocated to resolve technical issues discussed on the mailing
>> list). Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to
>> have read each document, you may want to explain the issue that
>> you are trying to solve, and how. 2) _Before requesting a slot_,
>> please make sure that your intent is to discuss specific
>> technical issues related to the document that could not be
>> resolved on the mailing list. In other words, please do not
>> request slots for IDs for which no discussion took place on the
>> mailing list.
>>
>> With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no
>> later than Monday July 18 at noon ET? Julien and I will publish
>> the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some delays but
>> hopefully an improved agenda.
>>
>> Many Thanks.
>>
>> JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
