Hi Adrian,
With a co-author "hat", although this has not been raised on the list,
it was implicit that we were talking about the normalized load. In my
opinion, the absolute load would not really be very useful.
Thanks.
JP.
On Mar 7, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi,
During IESG review of draft-ietf-pce-of, the question was raised as
to whether OF 2 (Minimum Load Path) was using the normalised load
(i.e., the percentage of link bandwidth still available) rather than
the absolute load (i.e., the actual amount of bandwidth available).
I do not recall this question being raised on the list, so please
respond by saying
whether you are content with the current definition of OF 2
(normalised load), would like to change it to absolute load, or
would like to introduce a further OF for absolute load.
Thanks,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
