Hi,
Post last call we found a nit in this draft.
I don't think that fixing it does more than change a nonsense typo into
meaningful text.
Please shout if you have any issues with the change.
Thanks,
Adrian
The change is...
6.1. Control of Function Through Configuration and Policy
The treatment of a path segment as a CPS, and its substitution in
a PCReq ERO with a PKS, is a function that MUST be under operator
s/PCReq/PCRep/
and policy control where a PCE supports the function. The operator
MUST be given the ability to specify which path segments are to be
replaced and under what circumstances. For example, an operator
might set a policy that states that every path segment for the
operator's domain will be replaced by a PKS when the PCReq has
been issued from outside the domain.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
