Yes for all. Autumn
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 3:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Pce Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8 Send Pce mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Pce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Poll on further WG I-Ds (Adrian Farrel) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:40:01 +0100 From: Adrian Farrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, Following up some actions from Dublin... Can you please express an opinion on whether the following thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working group I-Ds. draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list Thanks, Adrian ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce End of Pce Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8 ********************************** _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
