Yep, make sure the latest system firmware is installed.

On 2 Jun 2014, at 12:04 pm, tim cumings <thcumi...@comcast.net> wrote:

> dane do you have to install any special software on the h-1 to do this. Or do 
> you simnply hook it up to a an usb port and it shows up as an input device?
> 
> On 6/1/2014 5:35 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>> Speaking of Sound Devices and the like I meant to mention my new Zoom H1, 
>> I've tested it as a sound device and yes it works well.
>> 
>> Put simply connecting the Zoom H1 ia a USB connection turns the H1 into a 
>> high quality x/y pattern desktop microphone, extend this by adding another 
>> microphone to the Mic input socket, don't know how this would go with a 
>> Line-in source though I can't see why it wouldn't work.
>> 
>> On 2 Jun 2014, at 7:05 am, Joe Paton <j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dave,
>>> 
>>> I think that the device is probably capable of sounding pretty good, if
>>> only, the interface from dell were accessible.
>>> 
>>> On other machines, the real tek devices have been pretty ok, often
>>> picking up a bit of digital noise from the bus, but ok for my needs.
>>> 
>>> Take care,
>>> 
>>> Joe
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:36:31 -0700
>>> Dave McElroy <d...@drakelroy.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Gee thanks, Joe, lol.  Guess what sound i've got with my new pc?  yep, the
>>> Realtech.  Well, so far i guess it is ok for my admittedly more linitted
>>> needs, but i do wish i could bump up the highs.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe Paton
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 12:56 PM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: Sound card recommendation wanted
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I aggree that on-board sound systems can be pretty good.
>>> 
>>> Comparisons between different sound cards, if supported by
>>> specifications are invaluable. If not, then an element of subjectivity
>>> takes us in to an area where opinions are only really valuable to the
>>> holder of these opinions.  So here are some of my opinions.
>>> 
>>> I used to be happy with my audiofile 24/96.  There were occasional
>>> problems with crackle on one channel, this would go away if the system
>>> were rebooted.  I suspect that this was a driver issue, but never really
>>> got behind the problem.
>>> 
>>> I used this card with XP, and more recently windows 7.  The control
>>> pannel, delivered with the latest
>>> revision of the drivers became unusable with a screen reader, However
>>> when set up, the card behaved well enough, considering that the price
>>> also has dropped from the time when I first bought mine, some 8 years
>>> ago.  Still a good card, and gave good latency when used with Reeper.
>>> 
>>> Then I changed the computer, and bought a Dell optiplex, I5 processor, 8
>>> GB ram, and 1 TB HD.
>>> 
>>> The onboard audio device, a real tek High definition audio system, is
>>> quite frankly, the worst audio device I have ever worked with.
>>> 
>>> Dell's control pannel, is partly accessible, but it is hit and miss when
>>> changing settings.  There are settings in the control pannel, that are
>>> not exposed to the windows mixer, so you have to use it.
>>> 
>>> I couldn't use the audiofile 24/96 because the optiplex uses PCIE slots
>>> only.  The audiofile, is available only as a PCI board, and although
>>> there are converters from PCIe to PCI, the profile of the 24/96 excludes
>>> it from this adaption so this sound card is now in an older dell, which
>>> will run only as long as the capacitors hold out on the board, and they
>>> are blowing so life is limited.
>>> 
>>> This is why I am now looking to use the audio interfaces from tascam.
>>> 
>>> I already have a US-122-A B but this device has no windows 7 drivers.
>>> shame.
>>> 
>>> So I am looking at the current tascam range, similar to the device I
>>> already own, and this replacement should cost about 80 UK pounds.
>>> 
>>> Then we should be good to go as they say.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Joe
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:33:14 -0500
>>> Kelly Pierce <kellyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> dane accurately points out that many quality computers have high
>>> definition audio built right into the motherboard or chip.  Last year
>>> I bought a Dell 8700 with the Intel 4770 processor.  It had built in
>>> high-definition audio equal to and actually slightly better than the
>>> M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 audio interface I bought 10 years ago for my
>>> XP machine.  I like working with two sound cards so I can manage the
>>> screen reader audio and music independently.  About a month ago, I
>>> bought the Roland Duo audio interface from e-Bay for $37, including
>>> shipping.  It is a USB interface that has both line in and microphone
>>> inputs, the latter with a pre-amp.  It is compatible with windows 8.1
>>> and except for one button during installation, it is accessible with
>>> JAWS.  Instruments sound distinct and unprocessed.  Normally, this
>>> retails for about $200.
>>> 
>>> Kelly
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/1/14, Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net> wrote:
>>>> Okay, I've done a Google search to see if this device is available in
>>>> Australia, the 129 device is easily got through eBay though I'd have to
>>>> import it so I will import if I can't get the device in Australia.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway back to my initial Google Search, I came up first with the 100
>>> model
>>>> so the obvious question is, what's the difference between the 100 and the
>>>> 129 models?
>>>> 
>>>> On 31 May 2014, at 11:09 pm, Joe Paton <j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>> You could look at the   Tascam US 122 MK II USB Audio-Interface:
>>>>> I'm about to get a-hold of the next model, us-124 I think it is, only
>>>>> because it has a variable line-out.  All the controls are mounted on the
>>>>> top of the device, so you don't really need the accompanying software.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Check it out.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Joe
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2014 22:29:10 +1000
>>>>> Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> One of the best external Sound devices I ever purchased was the iMic,
>>>>> thankfully I was able to purchase half a dozen of these at the time as
>>>>> they don't seem to be available as readily as they once were.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 29 May 2014, at 11:00 pm, Michael Mote <miketmot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi there!  I would like to find an external one, that has separate jacks
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> line-in and headphone.  My sound card on my Del Latitude only has one
>>>>>> plug,
>>>>>> making it very difficult to use like I need   to use it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>> Nelson
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:23 AM
>>>>>> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>>>>>> Subject: RE: Sound card recommendation wanted
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unfortunately, I doubt that you will be able to find a sound card which
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> Jaws friendly software.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, go to techbuy.com.au and do a search for sound card.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There are still several cards made by Creative (even though their model
>>>>>> names do their best to hide the nature of their functions).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suggest that you look closely at the Asus XONAR cards.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bob Nelson
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Barry
>>>>>> Chapman
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2014 2:14 PM
>>>>>> To: PC-Audio
>>>>>> Subject: Sound card recommendation wanted
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can anyone suggest a good quality internal sound card where the
>>>>>> accompanying
>>>>>> software is JAWS friendly. I want one with separate line in and
>>>>>> microphone
>>>>>> jacks and if possible two sets of stereo line out. My old Sound Blaster
>>>>>> Live
>>>>>> could do this.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks very much,
>>>>>> Barry Chapman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> **********
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Joe Paton <j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> **********
>>>> 
>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Joe Paton <j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Joe Paton <j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> **********
>> 
>> Dane Trethowan
>> Skype: grtdane12
>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>> Mobile: +61400494862
>> faceTime +61400494862
>> Fax +61397437954
>> Twitter: @grtdane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


**********

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane




Reply via email to