What you're doing is pretty much the sort of thing a modern day DSP is capable 
of in a Surround-Sound system so try this when you get a moment.

Get one of those old time radio shows and play it on your Surround-Sound system 
but set the mode to "Mono Movie" or similar, try different modes and see what 
happens or - depending on your system - you can adjust the effect levels to 
your need.


On 27 May 2014, at 1:35 pm, Gary Wood <k8...@att.net> wrote:

> Well Tom, one thing I did, I collected old-time radio tapes for several years 
> during the 80's.  I used a graphics equalizer at the time, and I created a 
> stereo effect by puttinng one voice on the left channel by raising the left 
> lever, and for the other person, I raised the right lever to give that 
> effect, and it amazed me when listening to it later, even though I knew what 
> I had done.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan" <grtd...@internode.on.net>
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:21 PM
> Subject: Re: listen to music in surround sound
> 
> 
> That's pretty much the case yes,
> 
> 
> On 27 May 2014, at 12:10 pm, Tom Kaufman <tomca...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Okay...I'll jump in on this; please understand I don't claim to know a whole
>> lot about it, but if one is listening to music in "surround sound" (and it
>> wasn't originally produced that way) isn't this a little like trying to
>> listen to music in stereo that wasn't recorded that way:?  Believe me, I've
>> heard music that was "re-enhanced" for stereo; for the most part, it just
>> don't get it for me!  I love stereo, but all too often, I've heard music
>> that was, shall we say "re-channeled" (for lack of a better term) to make it
>> _sound_ like it's in stereo; it just doesn't work!
>> Tom Kaufman
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wood
>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 10:03 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: listen to music in surround sound
>> 
>> To me, listening to music in surround sound doesn't sound simulated at all.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan" 
>> <grtd...@internode.on.net>
>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 6:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: listen to music in surround sound
>> 
>> 
>> If you like listening to music through a surround-sound system with a DSP
>> effect then fine! and you're underlining the point that an audiophile is
>> making, you're listening to music in a way that wasn't normally intended for
>> 
>> it to be listened to so the argument then goes that - because of the extra
>> artificial effect applied by the DSP - you're not able to fully appreciate
>> the purity of the music, quality of the music etc that you would otherwise
>> experience from a better quality 2 channel system.
>> 
>> There are exceptions to the rule of course and I'm talking here of quad
>> recordings or SACD etc but again these are not very common and aren't in
>> mainstream music recordings, you don't see Quad FM nowadays or you don't see
>> 
>> SACD recordings in large numbers at your local record shops.
>> 
>> 
>> On 27 May 2014, at 9:40 am, Gary Wood <k8...@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well John, I also find music in surround sound preferable than just stereo
>> 
>>> for the reasons you mentioned, for the enveloping quality of music done
>>> that way.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gurd" <j.g...@ntlworld.com>
>>> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 5:16 PM
>>> Subject: RE: listen to music in surround sound
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I often listen to music in surround sound effect for the sheer enveloping
>>>> fun of it even though there can be a little loss in quality. I have a
>>>> fairly
>>>> old but very good home theatre set up with Bours & Wilkins media wall
>>>> speakers and a Linn Sizmik subwoofer with an Arcam AV600 receiver.
>>>> Although
>>>> stereo sounds more dynamic and accurate I often listen to music in
>>>> surround
>>>> sound simulation because it does it so well and is kind of magical. A
>>>> really
>>>> good Blue ray movie is so involving I've sometimes turned audio
>>>> description
>>>> off to get the full effect. The only music recording I have in genuine
>>>> 5.1
>>>> is a recently acquired Pure Audio remaster of the Genesis album Selling
>>>> England by The Pound. It's wonderful. I can't understand why more great
>>>> albums haven't been done this way.
>>>> 
>>>> I've also got an old Logitec Z5500 5.1 speaker set attached to my PC and
>>>> with that system the surround simulation is far preferable to normal
>>>> stereo
>>>> because otherwise there's no real depth to the music.
>>>> 
>>>> To be honest, though, for convenience, most of the time I just stream
>>>> audio
>>>> from my PC or iPhone while I do other things. Incidentally, my pet hate
>>>> at
>>>> the moment is the way so many modern recordings have the volume
>>>> compressed
>>>> so that all the music is exactly the same level. I'm always trying to
>>>> turn
>>>> the music up to try to squeeze a bit more dynamic range out of it which
>>>> of
>>>> course doesn't really work.
>>>> 
>>>> John
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Gary
>>>> Wood
>>>> Sent: 26 May 2014 16:19
>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>>> Subject: Re: listen to music in surrround sound
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure nobody.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan"
>>>> <grtd...@internode.on.net>
>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 9:36 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: listen to music in surrround sound
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> And who has said that it wasn't?
>>>> 
>>>> On 27 May 2014, at 12:35 am, Gary Wood <k8...@att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> That may be true, but it's still a matter of choice, I believe.
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan"
>>>>> <grtd...@internode.on.net>
>>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 8:19 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: listen to music in surrround sound
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The fact is - whether we like it or not - 99% of the recorded music on
>>>>> the
>>>> 
>>>>> Planet was never recorded for surround-sound systems, it was either
>>>>> recorded in stereo or Mono.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 26 May 2014, at 11:17 pm, brian sackrider <n8...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi this is Brian Sackrider and it is a matter of prefference on how to
>>>>>> listen to music if you listen toyour music in stereo or in surround
>>>>>> sound
>>>> 
>>>>>> that is your prefference.  I used to have a pioneer surround sound
>>>>>> system
>>>> 
>>>>>> it was the htp 55 and I did like to listen to music in surround sound I
>>>>>> liked the concert hall effect and all of the seperation and the
>>>>>> acoostic
>>>>>> effects.  in my opinion that is the only to listen to music in full
>>>>>> surround sound you just can't get that kind of sound from stereo
>>>>>> speakers
>>>> 
>>>>>> iI do like to hear good stereo speakers but there is no compearason to
>>>>>> listening to music in surroundsound.
>>>>>> On 5/26/2014 2:54 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>>>>>>> You're right, they don't like surround-sound and they do have a point.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Surround-Sound systems are not designed for pure music listening,
>>>>>>> you're
>>>> 
>>>>>>> better off with a good stereo amp and a good pair of stereo speakers
>>>>>>> for
>>>> 
>>>>>>> doing things like that and here's their point, for the cost of a
>>>>>>> surround-sound system you can buy better sound stereo amp and
>>>>>>> speakers.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In short, surround-sound is for entertaining and enjoyable listening.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 26 May 2014, at 4:52 pm, Gary Wood <k8...@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Well it's too bad some people are like that.  I don't think
>>>>>>>> audiophiles
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> would like surround sound.  Someone told me once that when you add
>>>>>>>> more
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> speakers to the mix with surround sound, there is some loss of
>>>>>>>> quality.
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Heck, I even used to use a graphics equalizer with one piece of
>>>>>>>> equipment I had, but when I bought surround sound, the equalizer made
>>>>>>>> things sound distored, so I quit using it.  Audiophiles don't like
>>>>>>>> graphic equalizers.
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hamit Campos"
>>>>>>>> <hamitcam...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:49 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: Bose Soundlink 3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I know audiophiles don't like them. I've seen it on youtube. People
>>>>>>>>> make fun
>>>>>>>>> of people, people say the no highs, no lows, it must be Bose joke,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> hell,
>>>>>>>>> I've even seen death threats.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>>>> Dane
>>>>>>>>> Trethowan
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 2:11 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Bose Soundlink 3
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> As much as Bose users won't like to hear it, you won't find a Bose
>>>>>>>>> system or
>>>>>>>>> product mentioned in an audiophile magazine but that's nice to say
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> products are cheap, nasty and rubbish because that just isn't the
>>>>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The products are reasonable at worst and the company is very good to
>>>>>>>>> deal
>>>>>>>>> with, or it is here at any rate.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I've been able to try before I buy the products I have in my own
>>>>>>>>> home,
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> was one product I didn't like and I told Bose so after the trial,
>>>>>>>>> they
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>>> arrangements to pick the product up from me and I was given a refund
>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>> purchase price, no questions asked.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I had a problem with my Bose Soundlink Air and a pickup of the old
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> delivery of the new replacement was arranged, again no questions
>>>>>>>>> asked, no
>>>>>>>>> hitches etc, I just had to identify who I was.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 25 May 2014, at 4:08 pm, Gary Wood <k8...@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I guess people say that you get what you pay for, and maybe it's
>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>> it.  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Otten"
>>>>>>>>>> <maryot...@comcast.net>
>>>>>>>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 7:25 PM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Bose Soundlink 3
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if anybody on list owns this speaker from Bose. It costs
>>>>>>>>>>> $300.
>>>>>>>>>>> I saw one briefly last evening at the Verizon store, as I was
>>>>>>>>>>> purchasing my new iPhone and was pretty impressed with the sound,
>>>>>>>>>>> given the size of the box. I really haven't looked all that much
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> to this sort of speaker. I have an older dock that works with the
>>>>>>>>>>> older style iPhone connectors, and it really sounds pretty good,
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> my better half has sort of taken it over for use in his
>>>>>>>>>>> class-room.
>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd like to know from those who have experienced this
>>>>>>>>>>> equipment,
>>>>>>>>>>> what did you think, and are there other units you'd recommend as
>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>> competition? I like the size and the volume and depth of sound,
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> am not thrilled with the $300 price tag, naturally.
>>>>>>>>>>> Mary
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> **********
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>>>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>>>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> **********
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> **********
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> **********
>>>> 
>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>> faceTime +61400494862
>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>> Twitter: @grtdane
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********
>> 
>> Dane Trethowan
>> Skype: grtdane12
>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>> Mobile: +61400494862
>> faceTime +61400494862
>> Fax +61397437954
>> Twitter: @grtdane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> **********
> 
> Dane Trethowan
> Skype: grtdane12
> Phone US (213) 438-9741
> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
> Mobile: +61400494862
> faceTime +61400494862
> Fax +61397437954
> Twitter: @grtdane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


**********

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane




Reply via email to