List, I use Audacity every week for recording Handiham audio lectures and a weekly podcast. It's got a bit of a learning curve, but it works very well for me. I can see and do not access it with a screenreader but I know its developers do pay attention to accessibility. Before I used Audacity, I had Cool Edit by Syntrillium software. It was bought by Adobe and turned into Audition, which I thought was out of my price range. Once I determined to learn Audacity, I really did get to like it. The tools I use most are noise reduction, normalization, automatic leveling, and the automatic trimming of silence. Best regards,
Patrick Tice wa0...@arrl.net ________________________________ From: Brian Olesen <br...@blindkom.dk> To: PC Audio Discussion List <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:41 PM Subject: Re: comparing adobe audition and audacity HI, Audacity is free and the developing still goes on, so it's still a very versatile project. Brian -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- From: Merv Keck Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 6:48 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: comparing adobe audition and audacity Adobe Audition has not been accessible in years. Not since like version 1.5 or something like that way back in 2006 or before. They talked about coming out with a new 64 bit version of Audition for years and I had hoped they would make it accessible or that someone would be able to script it but they never improved on Audition 3 which is not accessible. When I was a high partial I thought that was the best program I ever used and loved the dual monitor support but since losing over 99% of my vision had to abandon it. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
