List,

I use Audacity every week for recording Handiham audio lectures and a weekly 
podcast.  It's got a bit of a learning curve, but it works very well for me. I 
can see and do not access it with a screenreader but I know its developers do 
pay attention to accessibility.  Before I used Audacity, I had Cool Edit by 
Syntrillium software.  It was bought by Adobe and turned into Audition, which I 
thought was out of my price range.  Once I determined to learn Audacity, I 
really did get to like it. The tools I use most are noise reduction, 
normalization, automatic leveling, and the automatic trimming of silence. 
 
Best regards,


Patrick Tice
wa0...@arrl.net


________________________________
 From: Brian Olesen <br...@blindkom.dk>
To: PC Audio Discussion List <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: comparing adobe audition and audacity
 

HI,
Audacity is free and the developing still goes on, so it's still a very 
versatile project.

Brian

-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- 
From: Merv Keck
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 6:48 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: comparing adobe audition and audacity

Adobe Audition has not been accessible in years. Not since like version 1.5
or something like that way back in 2006  or before.
They talked about coming out with a new 64 bit version of Audition for years
and I had hoped they would make it accessible or that someone would be able
to script it but they never improved on Audition 3 which is not accessible.
When I was a high partial I thought that was the best program I ever used
and loved the dual monitor support but since losing over 99% of my vision
had to abandon it.


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to